An honest verdict on your PM, TPM, or Data Science interview — before the real one counts.
No card. One verdict, free.
Calibrated to the bar at Meta
A verdict tells you where you stand. Here’s what happens next.
Prep guide
Every gap you have is already addressed by freely available resources — no paywall, no certification required. Courses just repackage that same content and charge you $500. We find the specific guides and videos that target exactly where you’re weak and hand you a ranked plan. Prep free. Test with a live interview. Repeat until you pass.
No card. One verdict, one guide, free.
MockExpert · Prep Guide
Product Manager · Meta
Your #1 growth area
Curated for you
"Structuring ambiguous product questions"
12 min
"Data-driven prioritization frameworks"
18 min
"The RICE framework, explained"
Ranked by relevance to your gaps — not generic top-10 lists
The real problem
Self-study gives you no signal. Friends are too nice to tell you the truth. So you find out whether you were ready in the room — when it’s too late to fix anything.
And even once you know what’s weak, the internet has a million interview prep videos and no way to tell which ones actually address your gap. You end up either skipping prep entirely or burning hours on generic content that doesn’t move the needle.
A PM offer at a top tech company adds $100–300k to your total comp. The difference between Hire and No Hire is usually not ability — it’s how you communicate under pressure.
You have one loop. Going in without calibrated feedback isn’t brave — it’s a preventable risk.
No card · 5 minutes
Calibrated to the bar at Google
What you get
After each session you get an honest, calibrated judgment: would you clear the bar at this company, for this role, right now? Not a score out of five — a Pass, Borderline, or Not yet, plus exactly which competencies to fix.
Calibrated against real hiring-bar signals from Google, Meta, Amazon, and more — not generic rubrics.
Four steps, every session — from your first answer to your prep plan.
You talk. We listen.
Structured questions, live follow-ups, probes on vague answers — just as a real panel would.
Every answer, scored.
Each response mapped against real hiring-bar signals — not generic rubrics or keyword matching.
Calibrated to the bar at Google
The verdict.
Pass, Borderline, or Not yet — calibrated to the bar — with a specific plan to improve.
Your growth areas
"Structuring ambiguous Qs" · 12 min
"RICE framework, explained"
Then, a plan.
Borderline or Not yet? We hand you the specific resources to close the gap before you go again.
Four steps. Five minutes. One honest verdict and a prep plan.
Product sense, execution, analytical thinking, strategy — scored against the PM bar at Google, Meta, Stripe, and others. Know whether your storytelling, prioritisation, and data fluency are at the level before you walk in.
System design, cross-functional leadership, and program execution — scored against the TPM bar at Amazon, Apple, Microsoft. Know exactly how your answers hold up under the technical depth and scope these roles demand.
ML modelling, experimentation, and business impact — scored against the DS bar at Google, Netflix, Meta. Move past “strong technically” and understand whether your insights actually land as business decisions.
What you get
After every session — a full breakdown with specific evidence, not just a number.
MockExpert · Session Report
Product Manager · Meta
Competency Scores
| = Typical passing threshold
Q: “How would you improve Meta’s notification centre?”
+ Covered
− Missing
9%
Filler words
14
Hedge words
138 WPM
Speaking pace
892
Total words
No card required · First interview is free
Prep guide
Real resources, ranked by how directly they close your specific gaps — not a generic reading list.
MockExpert · Prep Guide
Product Manager · Meta
Primary gap — below passing threshold
You framed solutions well but missed data-backed tradeoff discussion in 2 of 3 answers.
Curated resources — ranked by relevance to your gap
"Structuring ambiguous product questions"
12 min · Exponent
Directly addresses your weakest answer pattern
"Data-driven prioritization frameworks"
18 min · Lenny Rachitsky
Covers the tradeoff framing you skipped
"The RICE framework, explained"
Intercom Product Blog
Framework reference for quantified prioritization
"Data-informed vs. data-driven PMs — the difference"
Reforge
Addresses the analytical depth gap specifically
Ranked by relevance to your gaps — not generic top-10 lists
No card required · Verdict and prep guide, free
Why MockExpert
Peer mock · Pramp, friends
“Their opinion. Once. If they showed up.”
Prep plan
None — you’re on your own.
No calibration · No consistency
Generic AI · ChatGPT, Claude
Great job! You communicated your ideas clearly and showed strong self-awareness. Keep practising — you’re on the right track!
Prep plan
Generic reading list if you ask.
Encouragement, not calibration
MockExpert · calibrated verdict
Calibrated to the bar at Meta
Prep plan
Curated resources, ranked to your specific gaps.
Calibrated · Specific · Actionable
Try free →Start with the free interview. Get the verdict and a prep guide. Upgrade for the full breakdown.
Free
$0
Single
$29
one-time
Triple
$79
≈$26 each
Complete
$99
one-time
Bonus guide credit unlocks when you revise your resume or tailor it to a specific job description.
Secure payment via Stripe · No subscription · Pay once, use anytime
Give a free interview, earn account credit.
Your friend gets a free full interview. You earn credit toward a paid pack.